Skip navigation

Since I spent some time tweaking the AI in Freekick 3, I thought I should write down some of the implementation details for future reference.

The AI has quite a simple general structure. Apart from the special cases like restarts, goalkeeper AI etc. the main gameplay AI consists of three states: defensive AI, offensive AI and the AI when the agent is about to kick the ball. Whether a player is in the defensive or offensive state depends on the match situation (where the ball is, who has the ball) and the team tactics (agent’s position).

The defensive state is basically a decision “where should I stand to make the opponent’s offensive difficult”. There are a few options: try to take the ball from the opponent, try to block an opponent’s pass or shot or guard some area or opponent. The AI simply assigns scores to each action and picks the action with the highest score. (This, I suppose pretty standard AI technique, seems to be inspired by utility functions and is used throughout the Freekick 3 AI.)

The offensive state is even simpler than the defensive state: either the player tries to fetch the ball or tries to place himself in the best possible supporting position, which should be somewhere that can be passed to, far away from opposing players, and a good shot position. (The AI builds a kind of an influence map that is also affected by some soccer-specific things such as the offside rule.)

Probably the most important decision the AI has to make is what to do when the agent has the ball. Again, like with the defensive state, the AI has a few different possible actions, and it assigns scores to all of them and simply picks the action with the highest score.

The possible actions are Pass, Shoot, Long Pass, Clear, Tackle and Dribble. I’ll start with the Pass action.

When deciding the pass target, the AI loops through all of the friendly players and keeps track of the best option. For each player that’s not too far or too close, the AI considers either passing directly to the player or trying a through-pass. The base score for the pass is highest for players nearer the enemy goal, and then decreased for each opponent player that is seen as a possible interceptor.

The Shoot action score is basically a function of distance to the opponent’s goal and the distance from the opponent’s players (especially the goal keeper) to the possible shot trajectory.

The Long Pass action is actually a composite of Shoot and Pass – it checks for the Shoot and Pass action scores of the friendly players and chooses to make a long pass (or cross) to the player with the highest score. As with other actions, the score is multiplied by a team tactics coefficient, allowing the coach to influence the team’s playing style.

Clear and Tackle are basically emergency brakes that the AI can pull in a situation where the ball needs to be kicked away from the own goal or the opposing players.

With Dribble, the AI creates a few possible rays at regular angle intervals around the agent as possible dribble vectors and assigns scores to each of them. Similar to shooting, the score is higher near the opponent goal, but decreased by opponent presence.

So, in the end, the AI is composed by several rather simple techniques. It’s all heuristics without any algorithms providing optimal solutions (if any can even be used in soccer AI). It uses some simple seeking behaviors (arrive at a position, chase the ball). There’s one simple state machine, with state transitions decided mostly by the ball position. The top level AI is built around simple if-then-else-statements (I suppose you could call them decision trees). Lots of the decision making uses some sort of fuzzy logic, even though it’s not really structured like that (instead the code itself is fuzzy). Still, the AI manages to seem smart in most cases, it plays rather well and presents a challenge for the human player (for me, at least).

There are still quite a few standard AI techniques that I haven’t implemented which might make sense for Freekick 3. For example it might be interesting to experiment with adding some kind of learning ability to the AI, which should be possible using reinforcement learning, or adding a more complicated planning process with the use of a decision network. A useful first step would be to extract all the used generic concepts like decision trees and fuzzy logic to their own code pieces, which would enable experimenting with things like learning a decision tree.

My conclusion is that there are lots of different game AI techniques, many of which are quite simple, and the key to creating a fun AI is to find out which techniques to use for which problem and how to combine the techniques. The techniques are often intuitive but can be also described mathematically, so that when reading up on game AI, you may, depending on the material, get an impression that game AI is either very non-scientific or very mathematical (and therefore difficult), while I think it can be either, depending on how you look at it.

For the interested, the ~500 lines of Freekick 3 AI that make up the core can be found at GitHub.



  1. Is there any way to play this game on Windows or Mac without going through the hassle of github, makefiles, etc.?

    I was interested in how you programmed this game because it’s something I’ve thought about (the whole scoring thing), but I didn’t know if it could actually work or not.

    Is there an .exe I can download?

    • Hi Akira,

      There’s no .exe available unfortunately so if you want to play the game you’ll need to compile it yourself. I don’t have a Windows or Mac computer available so creating a functional binary is a bit difficult for me. The scoring thing works (I assume you mean the process of giving scores to the possible actions and selecting the best option) but it required quite a bit of tweaking to get it right. After writing the blog post I’ve seen a similar method described in “Artificial Intelligence for Games” by Millington and Funge. They call the algorithm “goal-oriented behavior” and use the term “utility” for score. Their implementation is more generic than mine but it has the same principle.

  2. Ah I see, thanks for the info! I suppose I’ll have to try it out myself.

    Out of curiosity does your game implement player stats/abilities of some sort? Not just dribbling ability, shot precision or things like that, I’m also talking about player behaviors. For example one player is more altruistic and will pass more etc.

    I think that would be an interesting thing to work on. I’m still only learning how to program but I enjoy thinking about pseudo-code and theorising 🙂

    • Sorry for the late reply. I haven’t implemented different player behaviors but I’ve thought about it and it’s something that should be easy to do as there are quite a bit of magic constants in the AI code that provide typical behavior, it’s just a matter of parameterizing those. I do have some team tactic parameters that provide something similar though; for example, there’s a team-wide value (set by the coach) that defines whether the players should kick long balls or short passes (there’s a screenshot showing these in the team menu).

        • Akira
        • Posted August 19, 2014 at 10:26 pm
        • Permalink

        Interesting, sounds easier than I thought.

        I’ll let you know if I ever get started on a similar project 🙂

  3. How can i play the game

    • Hi nil,

      If you’re on Windows then there’s no easy way unfortunately as I don’t have the precompiled binaries available. If you’re on Linux then you can compile it using instructions at


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: